Who Are The Khawarij?

By Kyle Orton (@KyleWOrton) on April 17, 2014

2016-11-10-is-closing-in-on-palmyra-p10

Since the Syrian rebellion went to war with the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) in January, there has been a parallel campaign of political warfare by the rebels and al-Qaeda’s branch in Syria, Jabhat an-Nusra, to delegitimize ISIS. This has often taken the form of referring to ISIS as Kharijites or the Khawarij.

This Khawarij are an ancient sect who broke from the Rashidun (Rightly-Guided) Caliphate in the name of righteous revolt in 658, and continued their campaign against the caliphate—by then in the hands of the Umayyads—for a century and more. Regarded as perhaps the first terrorists in Islamdom (by another definition it would be the Nizaris, a.k.a. “The Assassins”), the connotations of the Khawarij label are extremism and deviance, particularly a tendency to excommunicate (make takfir against) Muslims not only for sins that do not merit excommunication, but simply for reasons of political exclusivism.

The Historical Khawarij

In June 656, the Third Caliph, Uthman, had been murdered, and was succeeded by the most prominent remaining companion of the Prophet Muhammad, his cousin, who was also married to his daughter, Ali. (A faction of the early Muslims believed this familial tie should have made Ali into Muhammad’s successor. The Shi’at Ali­—Partisans of Ali—would in time become a separate sect, the Shi’a, and Ali would be recognized as their First Imam.)

Uthman’s kin, led by Muawiya, the governor of Syria, had vowed revenge and Ali’s failure to punish the regicides led Muawiya to refused allegiance to Ali as Caliph. Ali attempted to compel recognition by force and a civil war broke out. Muawiya sued for arbitration by religious scholars and Ali had little choice theologically but to accept; the result recommended the selection of a new caliph and Ali rejected it.

A Bedouin faction broke from Ali in consequence of his refusing the arbitration decision, and these became the Kharijites (literally “those who walk out”). Some Kharijites were convinced by Ali’s son, Abbas, to return to the fold; those who continued in rebellion were crushed on 17 July 658 by Ali at Nahrawan, along the banks of the Tigris in southern Iraq, where they had set up camp.

Muawiya had carefully registered his grievance only in the name of a blood-feud, until July 660 when he had himself proclaimed Caliph in Jerusalem, a claim registered not only in name but in steady military advances in the Maghreb as well as the Mashriq.

Some Kharijites had survived Ali’s onslaught, and declared everybody outside their band to be heretics, making war on them all. Unable to fight as a conventional force, the Kharijites moved to asymmetric tactics; they nearly assassinated Muawiya and did kill Ali on 29 January 661, unwittingly handing the caliphate to Muawiya. Muawiya moved the caliphal capital to Damascus, which would be the seat of the Umayyad dynasty for the next ninety years. The Khawarij themselves remained a fringe menace during that period.

The Modern Khawarij?

So how does ISIS stack up against the Khawarij? There is a strong resemblance. Both groups consider themselves a moral minority set against a corrupt order. Both use assassination and asymmetric techniques. ISIS does make free use of takfir against those outside its number. Historically speaking, however, the Kharijites never came to control territory in the way ISIS has. And in ideological terms there is probably among modern jihadists a more exact parallel in the Armed Islamic Group (GIA), which went further even than ISIS.

In August 1997, GIA declared all Muslims in Algeria—not just political and religious leaders—who did not join GIA to be heretics, and began massacring whole villages. ISIS has previously specifically rejected as a “lie” the idea that it makes takfir on people for lesser sins like adultery, drinking alcohol, and theft, and says it treats all who recite the shahada and follow Islam’s practices as Muslims until they prove themselves to be an apostate in word and deed.

While ISIS regards democracy as a heresy—indeed an alternate religion—it does not regard every individual who participates as murtadun (apostates). ISIS is clear that it regards the leaders of Iraqi political parties—the Muslim Brotherhood’s Iraqi Islamic Party being its particular bête noire—as heretics who must be slaughtered, but the rank-and-file party members, not just voters, are not axiomatically considered disbelievers. ISIS did, in 2005, enforce a ban on elections in the Sunni areas of Iraq and threatened the process, saying for example that if Iraqi Sunnis were harmed at polling stations they had only themselves to blame. This is a narrow but deep distinction with what the GIA did exactly ten years earlier, apostatizing every single person who took part in the election and threatening them, “one vote, one bullet”.

Advertisements

20 thoughts on “Who Are The Khawarij?

  1. Pingback: Ideologue Laments A Jihadist Joining the Islamic State | The Syrian Intifada

  2. Pingback: ISIS Announces the Restoration of the Caliphate | The Syrian Intifada

  3. Pingback: Al-Qaeda Leader Focuses on Main Enemies: Saudi Arabia and the Islamic State | The Syrian Intifada

  4. Pingback: Al-Qaeda’s Leader Calls for Jihadi Unity in Syria, Building a Caliphate | The Syrian Intifada

  5. Pingback: Jihadi Infighting: Clashes Erupt Between Al-Qaeda in Syria and Ahrar al-Sham | The Syrian Intifada

  6. Pingback: History Repeated: Al-Qaeda Attacks Syria’s Rebels, The West Does Nothing | The Syrian Intifada

  7. Pingback: ISIS’s Spokesman Attacks Al-Qaeda’s Ruling That ISIS Should Leave Syria | The Syrian Intifada

  8. Pingback: Al-Qaeda Says Attacking Syrian Rebel Groups Was Self-Defence Against A ‘Conspiracy’ | The Syrian Intifada

  9. Pingback: Pro-Al-Qaeda Ideologue on Merging With Non-Jihadi Groups | The Syrian Intifada

  10. Pingback: The Islamic State Guided the Normandy Church Attack | The Syrian Intifada

  11. Pingback: ISIS’s Spokesman Denounces Al-Qaeda’s Leader, Claims ISIS Is The Victim | The Syrian Intifada

  12. Pingback: The Spokesman of ISIS Says Al-Qaeda is Deviant | The Syrian Intifada

  13. Pingback: Al-Qaeda in Syria Condemns Al-Qaeda in Yemen’s Softness on the Islamic State | The Syrian Intifada

  14. Pingback: Jihadi Clerics Dispute Legitimacy of Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham | The Syrian Intifada

  15. Pingback: Al-Qaeda Aligned Jihadist in Syria Condemns Rebel Group Jaysh al-Islam | The Syrian Intifada

  16. Pingback: Al-Qaeda in Syria Condemn Jaysh al-Islam for East Ghuta Infighting | The Syrian Intifada

  17. Pingback: Islamist Clerics Reject Abu Muhammad al-Maqdisi’s Stance on Islamic State | The Syrian Intifada

  18. Pingback: Islamist Clerics Give Permission to Work with Turkey Against ISIS and PKK | The Syrian Intifada

  19. Pingback: Jihadi Ally Calls for Official Opposition Government to Take Over Idlib | The Syrian Intifada

  20. Pingback: Jihadi Cleric Calls for Al-Qaeda’s Leader in Syria To Be Put on Trial | The Syrian Intifada

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s