The Idlib Offensive: Delayed, Not Cancelled

By Kyle Orton (@KyleWOrton) on 20 September 2018

For about two months, it has seemed that an offensive by Bashar al-Assad’s regime, Iran, and Russia into Idlib was imminent, with disastrous humanitarian and strategic consequences. On Monday, an agreement was reached between Turkey and Russia that put a halt to this prospect, at least for now. There is good reason to think the pro-Assad forces are delaying, rather than cancelling, their plans to reconquer Idlib, but the extra time gives space to Turkey to alter the terms politically.

The Astana process—the political track over Syria set up in late 2016, involving Russia, Iran, and Turkey—created a series of “de-escalation zones” in May 2017. Covering northern Homs, the East Ghouta suburbs of Damascus, Deraa in the south, and Idlib, the ostensible purpose of these zones was to reduce violence. In fact, as with all previous ceasefire agreements, the regime coalition used the calm on some fronts to concentrate resources on another—and systematically liquidated the de-escalation zones, one after the other, until by late July there was only Idlib left.

Almost immediately, the Assad regime indicated its desire to move into Idlib. And it was clear how the attack would be framed: in the language of the War on Terror. Idlib was, said Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, a “festering abscess” that had to be eliminated, and he hoped the West would “not obstruct an anti-terror operation”.

The most dominant military force in Idlib is Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), the successor to Jabhat al-Nusra, al-Qaeda’s Syrian branch. HTS has broken from al-Qaeda’s command structure and al-Qaeda’s loyalists have regrouped into a faction calling itself Tandheem Hurras al-Deen. Nonetheless, HTS remains jihadist in ideology and is registered as a terrorist group, including now by Turkey. The “de-escalation agreement” had provisions calling for the removal of terrorists, and the pro-Assad coalition has used this pretext to politically prepare the ground for an assault on Idlib.

Read the rest at TRT World

One thought on “The Idlib Offensive: Delayed, Not Cancelled

  1. pre-Boomer Marine brat

    Considering that Erdogan has substantial affinity for the Muslim Brotherhood (his Rabaa sign), he’s not likely to share the characterization of HTS, et al, as “undesirable”. His daughter volunteered service in a hospital which was then treating ISIS casualties. Was it his son or son-in-law who traffics in ISIS’ Syrian oil? The October 2015 attack on the left-wing Ankara political rally was done by ISIS, but appears to have had covert AKP/Turkish help. Early-on, ISIS had rat-lines through Turkey just as al Qaida had through Syria. A decade ago, the Syrian ones were being actively enabled by Assef Shawkat, Bashar’s brother-in-law and head of the GID. Does anyone wish to try to convince me that Hulusi Akar knows absolutely nothing about any sort of ISIS rat-lines thru Turkey?

    Like

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s